| Title |
Competitive Trace Theory: A Role for the Hippocampus in Contextual Interference during Retrieval
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael A. Yassa, Zachariah M. Reagh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 335 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 15% |
| Researcher | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 41 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 126 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 81 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#543,235
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#88
of 3,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,801
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#3
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.