↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

Enhancement stimulants: perceived motivational and cognitive advantages

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 11,570)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Enhancement stimulants: perceived motivational and cognitive advantages
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2013.00198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irena P. Ilieva, Martha J. Farah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 118 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 32%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Professor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 377. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#82,910
of 25,464,544 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#35
of 11,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#436
of 289,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,464,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.