↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

Do cavies talk? The effect of anthropomorphic picture books on children's knowledge about animals

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
40 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Do cavies talk? The effect of anthropomorphic picture books on children's knowledge about animals
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia A. Ganea, Caitlin F. Canfield, Kadria Simons-Ghafari, Tommy Chou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 159 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 11 7%
Professor 8 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 30%
Social Sciences 25 15%
Arts and Humanities 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 368. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#86,275
of 25,505,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#163
of 34,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#640
of 241,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#2
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,505,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.