↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

Strategies for transferring resistance into wheat: from wide crosses to GM cassettes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
62 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for transferring resistance into wheat: from wide crosses to GM cassettes
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2014.00692
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brande B. H. Wulff, Matthew J. Moscou

Abstract

The domestication of wheat in the Fertile Crescent 10,000 years ago led to a genetic bottleneck. Modern agriculture has further narrowed the genetic base by introducing extreme levels of uniformity on a vast spatial and temporal scale. This reduction in genetic complexity renders the crop vulnerable to new and emerging pests and pathogens. The wild relatives of wheat represent an important source of genetic variation for disease resistance. For nearly a century farmers, breeders, and cytogeneticists have sought to access this variation for crop improvement. Several barriers restricting interspecies hybridization and introgression have been overcome, providing the opportunity to tap an extensive reservoir of genetic diversity. Resistance has been introgressed into wheat from at least 52 species from 13 genera, demonstrating the remarkable plasticity of the wheat genome and the importance of such natural variation in wheat breeding. Two main problems hinder the effective deployment of introgressed resistance genes for crop improvement: (1) the simultaneous introduction of genetically linked deleterious traits and (2) the rapid breakdown of resistance when deployed individually. In this review, we discuss how recent advances in molecular genomics are providing new opportunities to overcome these problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 217 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 22%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 13%
Environmental Science 2 <1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 34 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,070,294
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#285
of 24,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,479
of 366,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,514 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.