↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

A “Wear and Tear” Hypothesis to Explain Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
67 X users
facebook
36 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
A “Wear and Tear” Hypothesis to Explain Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2016.00180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eran Elhaik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 30%
Psychology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#498,969
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#174
of 14,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,576
of 321,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#2
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.