↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

The Residual Innate Lymphoid Cells in NFIL3-Deficient Mice Support Suboptimal Maternal Adaptations to Pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
The Residual Innate Lymphoid Cells in NFIL3-Deficient Mice Support Suboptimal Maternal Adaptations to Pregnancy
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Selma Boulenouar, Jean-Marc Doisne, Amanda Sferruzzi-Perri, Louise M. Gaynor, Jens Kieckbusch, Elisa Balmas, Hong Wa Yung, Shagayegh Javadzadeh, Léa Volmer, Delia A. Hawkes, Keli Phillips, Hugh J.M. Brady, Abigail L. Fowden, Graham J. Burton, Ashley Moffett, Francesco Colucci

Abstract

Uterine NK cells are innate lymphoid cells (ILC) that populate the uterus and expand during pregnancy, regulating placental development and fetal growth in humans and mice. We have recently characterized the composition of uterine ILCs (uILCs), some of which require the transcription factor NFIL3, but the extent to which NFIL3-dependent cells support successful reproduction in mice is unknown. By mating Nfil3 (-/-) females with wild-type males, here we show the effects of NFIL3 deficiency in maternal cells on both the changes in uILCs during pregnancy and the downstream consequences on reproduction. Despite the presence of CD49a(+)Eomes(-) uILC1s and the considerable expansion of residual CD49a(+)Eomes(+) tissue-resident NK cells and uILC3s in pregnant Nfil3 (-/-) mice, we found incomplete remodeling of uterine arteries and decidua, placental defects, and fetal growth restriction in litters of normal size. These results show that maternal NFIL3 mediates non-redundant functions in mouse reproduction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Bachelor 13 19%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 13 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,542,258
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,154
of 31,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,897
of 312,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#73
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.