↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

Article Metrics

Embed badge What is this page?

“I Must Try Harder”: Design Implications for Mobile Apps and Wearables Contributing to Self-Efficacy of Patients With Chronic Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
“I Must Try Harder”: Design Implications for Mobile Apps and Wearables Contributing to Self-Efficacy of Patients With Chronic Conditions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02388
Pubmed ID
31749733
Authors

Sharon Wulfovich, Maddalena Fiordelli, Homero Rivas, Waldo Concepcion, Katarzyna Wac

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 8 8%
Computer Science 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 34 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,273,224
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,230
of 31,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,877
of 361,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#178
of 613 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 613 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Frontiers.