↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

“I Must Try Harder”: Design Implications for Mobile Apps and Wearables Contributing to Self-Efficacy of Patients With Chronic Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
“I Must Try Harder”: Design Implications for Mobile Apps and Wearables Contributing to Self-Efficacy of Patients With Chronic Conditions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon Wulfovich, Maddalena Fiordelli, Homero Rivas, Waldo Concepcion, Katarzyna Wac

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 45 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Psychology 11 9%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Computer Science 9 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 51 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,159,611
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,550
of 35,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,096
of 378,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#260
of 619 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 619 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.