↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

Article Metrics

Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 220)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
588 Mendeley
Title
Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419
Authors

Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Paul R. Ehrlich, Andrew Beattie, Gerardo Ceballos, Eileen Crist, Joan Diamond, Rodolfo Dirzo, Anne H. Ehrlich, John Harte, Mary Ellen Harte, Graham Pyke, Peter H. Raven, William J. Ripple, Frédérik Saltré, Christine Turnbull, Mathis Wackernagel, Daniel T. Blumstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,503 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 588 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 588 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 107 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 85 14%
Student > Master 71 12%
Other 40 7%
Student > Bachelor 36 6%
Other 127 22%
Unknown 122 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120 20%
Environmental Science 116 20%
Social Sciences 43 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 3%
Other 123 21%
Unknown 146 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3497. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,303
of 21,823,161 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#1
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114
of 488,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,823,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.