Title |
Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419 |
Authors |
Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Paul R. Ehrlich, Andrew Beattie, Gerardo Ceballos, Eileen Crist, Joan Diamond, Rodolfo Dirzo, Anne H. Ehrlich, John Harte, Mary Ellen Harte, Graham Pyke, Peter H. Raven, William J. Ripple, Frédérik Saltré, Christine Turnbull, Mathis Wackernagel, Daniel T. Blumstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,351 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 283 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 205 | 9% |
Australia | 101 | 4% |
Canada | 80 | 3% |
Spain | 62 | 3% |
Germany | 58 | 2% |
France | 37 | 2% |
Colombia | 34 | 1% |
Netherlands | 28 | 1% |
Other | 352 | 15% |
Unknown | 1111 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2011 | 86% |
Scientists | 231 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 71 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 2% |
Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 664 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 664 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 108 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 14% |
Student > Master | 77 | 12% |
Other | 45 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 40 | 6% |
Other | 117 | 18% |
Unknown | 182 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 126 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 123 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 47 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 3% |
Other | 124 | 19% |
Unknown | 206 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3432. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,691
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#2
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100
of 528,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.