The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,337 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419 |
| Authors |
Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Paul R. Ehrlich, Andrew Beattie, Gerardo Ceballos, Eileen Crist, Joan Diamond, Rodolfo Dirzo, Anne H. Ehrlich, John Harte, Mary Ellen Harte, Graham Pyke, Peter H. Raven, William J. Ripple, Frédérik Saltré, Christine Turnbull, Mathis Wackernagel, Daniel T. Blumstein |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 181 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 118 | 5% |
| Australia | 51 | 2% |
| Canada | 46 | 2% |
| Spain | 36 | 2% |
| Germany | 34 | 1% |
| Colombia | 23 | <1% |
| France | 22 | <1% |
| Ireland | 12 | <1% |
| Other | 222 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1592 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1995 | 85% |
| Scientists | 234 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 71 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 758 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 758 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 122 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 100 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 11% |
| Other | 50 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 6% |
| Other | 135 | 18% |
| Unknown | 222 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 138 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 135 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 49 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 142 | 19% |
| Unknown | 251 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3435. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,770
of 26,375,927 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#1
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106
of 538,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 538,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them