↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

Article Metrics

Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 136)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
496 Mendeley
Title
Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419
Authors

Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Paul R. Ehrlich, Andrew Beattie, Gerardo Ceballos, Eileen Crist, Joan Diamond, Rodolfo Dirzo, Anne H. Ehrlich, John Harte, Mary Ellen Harte, Graham Pyke, Peter H. Raven, William J. Ripple, Frédérik Saltré, Christine Turnbull, Mathis Wackernagel, Daniel T. Blumstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,243 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 496 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 101 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 14%
Student > Master 64 13%
Other 36 7%
Professor 31 6%
Other 95 19%
Unknown 98 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 106 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 21%
Social Sciences 40 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 3%
Other 92 19%
Unknown 119 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,276
of 20,113,314 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#2
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126
of 472,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,113,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.