↓ Skip to main content

Frontiers

Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 351)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
699 Mendeley
Title
Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2020.615419
Authors

Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Paul R. Ehrlich, Andrew Beattie, Gerardo Ceballos, Eileen Crist, Joan Diamond, Rodolfo Dirzo, Anne H. Ehrlich, John Harte, Mary Ellen Harte, Graham Pyke, Peter H. Raven, William J. Ripple, Frédérik Saltré, Christine Turnbull, Mathis Wackernagel, Daniel T. Blumstein

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,370 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 699 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 699 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 116 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 14%
Student > Master 78 11%
Other 46 7%
Student > Bachelor 44 6%
Other 138 20%
Unknown 178 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 134 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 19%
Social Sciences 47 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 3%
Other 140 20%
Unknown 203 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3371. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,686
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#2
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105
of 515,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.