| Title |
An Apple a Day: Which Bacteria Do We Eat With Organic and Conventional Apples?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Birgit Wassermann, Henry Müller, Gabriele Berg |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,603 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 217 | 8% |
| United States | 139 | 5% |
| Nigeria | 123 | 5% |
| Ghana | 67 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 65 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 59 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 36 | 1% |
| Philippines | 35 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 33 | 1% |
| Other | 658 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1171 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2344 | 90% |
| Scientists | 146 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 71 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 40 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 228 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 14% |
| Researcher | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 64 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,927
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2
of 27,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25
of 350,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2
of 659 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 659 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.